August 15, 2014
fileformat:

pu12in:

stunningpicture:

The camera angle they never show on TV

ooooooooooooooooooooooweee :)

OMG!!

fileformat:

pu12in:

stunningpicture:

The camera angle they never show on TV

ooooooooooooooooooooooweee :)

OMG!!

(via proletarianinstinct)

August 15, 2014

thinksquad:

Cops have been put on notice: Let the cameras roll.

Camera-shy cops across the city were reminded they can’t legally take action to stop someone from filming them while they’re on the beat, the Daily News has learned. The refresher was provided in a memo the chief of department’s office distributed to all police commands Wednesday.

“Members of the public are legally allowed to record police interactions,” the memo states. “Intentional interference such as blocking or obstructing cameras or ordering the person to cease constitutes censorship and also violates the First Amendment.”

Cops can take action if videographers and shutterbugs “interfere with police operations,” the memo notes.

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nypd-cops-told-memo-filmed-article-1.1898379

(via reagan-was-a-horrible-president)

August 15, 2014

lovebug:

kim-jong-chill:

what a difference 50 years can make

or not

So. Fucking. Important.

(via bohemianarthouse)

August 13, 2014

atraversso:

Night View by Takashi Kitajima

(Source: ATRAVERSSO, via proletarianinstinct)

August 12, 2014

mymodernmet:

England-based photographer Martin Kimbell uses long exposures and special lighting techniques to create spectacular light trails set against lovely landscapes. To capture each gorgeous spectacle, Kimbell attaches LED lights to a hoop and then tosses it up in the air to document the movement.

August 11, 2014
mitsurugireiji:

fasteronfire525:

xbeatrce:

It’s important that people see this

I dont even know who this is, but the media pulls shit like this often and it should be publicized.

mark duggan was the young man shot to death by the met police here in london, and whose murder, now ruled controversially as ‘legal’, sparked the summer riots a few years back.

mitsurugireiji:

fasteronfire525:

xbeatrce:

It’s important that people see this

I dont even know who this is, but the media pulls shit like this often and it should be publicized.

mark duggan was the young man shot to death by the met police here in london, and whose murder, now ruled controversially as ‘legal’, sparked the summer riots a few years back.

(via bohemianarthouse)

August 10, 2014

qyon:

HAHAHAHAHAHAH THIS IS MY FAV PHOTO SET EVER HAHAHAHAHAHA

(Source: pleatedjeans, via bohemianarthouse)

August 6, 2014
lostateminor:

>
The most famous monkey selfie of all time is now the subject of a legal battle with Wikipedia

From the ‘you can’t script it’ category comes this somewhat bizarre story about a pending legal entanglement between a clever monkey, a photographer, and Wikipedia. It all started back in 2011 when nature photographer David Slater had his equipment, erm, borrowed by a rather forthright primate who proceeded to take hundreds of selfies, including the ubiqitious one above which has since been adopted by Wikipedia in its Wikimedia Commons collection.
Slater requested they remove the image only to be advised by Wikipedia that they wouldn’t as it was technically the monkey who pushed the button on the camera to take the photo, not the David Slater himself. ‘But it was his camera, sir?’ Nope, according to Wikipedia, the copyright is legally held by the monkey, who, strangely enough, hasn’t had much to say about the proceedings.
Now the UK’s Telegraph are reporting that it’ll cost Slater an estimated £10,000 in legal fees to take the matter to court. All the while, Wikipedia remain unrepentant. Talk about taking the monkey!

lostateminor:

>

The most famous monkey selfie of all time is now the subject of a legal battle with Wikipedia

image

From the ‘you can’t script it’ category comes this somewhat bizarre story about a pending legal entanglement between a clever monkey, a photographer, and Wikipedia. It all started back in 2011 when nature photographer David Slater had his equipment, erm, borrowed by a rather forthright primate who proceeded to take hundreds of selfies, including the ubiqitious one above which has since been adopted by Wikipedia in its Wikimedia Commons collection.

Slater requested they remove the image only to be advised by Wikipedia that they wouldn’t as it was technically the monkey who pushed the button on the camera to take the photo, not the David Slater himself. ‘But it was his camera, sir?’ Nope, according to Wikipedia, the copyright is legally held by the monkey, who, strangely enough, hasn’t had much to say about the proceedings.

Now the UK’s Telegraph are reporting that it’ll cost Slater an estimated £10,000 in legal fees to take the matter to court. All the while, Wikipedia remain unrepentant. Talk about taking the monkey!

August 6, 2014

escapekit:

Disintegrating

Photographer Fabian Oefner dismantles each car completely, from the body shell to the smallest screws, then photographs them piece by piece in a specific position to obtain the illusion of an exploding car.

(Source: fabianoefner.com)

July 14, 2014

darksilenceinsuburbia:

Bruce Evans

Suburban Noir

1. Heads Up

2. Home Coming

3. Good Neighbors

4. Illumination

5. Suburban Mushrooms

6. The Key

7. Morning Paper